2012 starts with bad weather signs for insurers

January 29th, 2012 by admin | Comments Off | Filed in News

BOSTON (Reuters) – Damaging hailstorms in Australia. Unprecedented tornadoes in the southeastern United States. Constant windstorms in northern Europe. Sound familiar?

This year is starting a lot like last year in terms of unexpectedly severe weather, to the consternation of the insurance industry, which paid out more than $ 100 billion in 2011 on natural disasters.

That could put more pressure on the shares of property and casualty insurers, who did relatively better than other insurers last year but who have turned in a mixed performance so far in 2012, despite being a favorite of some analysts.

To be fair, more than half of the 2011 losses came from earthquakes in Japan and New Zealand, and earthquakes are impossible to precisely predict. Even so, some of the worst events of 2011 (like the U.S. tornadoes in April and May) took many by surprise, and there is yet to be much relief.

“There’s no sign that anything’s necessarily changed from a (catastrophe) perspective,” said JMP Securities analyst Matthew Carletti in an interview. “Catastrophes don’t follow a calendar year.”

The problem with a potentially rough start to the year is that most insurers expected 2012 to be better than 2011, which was either the worst or second-worst year in industry history, depending on the ultimate losses from flooding in Thailand.

The Insurance Information Institute surveyed executives at its annual industry forum this week and found that 75 percent expect their profits to rise.

Nearly 80 percent said they expect their combined ratio — how much they pay out in expenses and claims versus how much they take in from premiums — to improve after topping 108 in 2011. (The figure means they paid out $ 1.08 in claims and expenses for every $ 1 in premiums they collected).

CAUSES FOR OPTIMISM

Any change to the contrary could add up for insurers like Travelers Cos Inc (TRV.N: Quote, Profile, Research, Stock Buzz), which will kick off the industry’s earnings season on January 24, as well as peers like Chubb Corp (CB.N: Quote, Profile, Research, Stock Buzz) and Allstate Corp (ALL.N: Quote, Profile, Research, Stock Buzz). Both Chubb and Travelers are underperforming the sector this year after having a better 2011 than most. Travelers shares are up 0.9 percent this year and Chubb shares are down 0.3 percent, while the Standard & Poor’s insurance index is up 3.6 percent on the year.

That will disappoint some who thought the property insurers could stand out this year. Janney Capital Markets unit Langen McAlenney, in its 2012 preview, said it would allocate 40 percent of a theoretical sector investment to property insurers, against 15 percent a year ago and 25 percent eight months ago.

But JMP’s Carletti argued there are still plenty of reasons for optimism, particularly as insurers like Travelers and Chubb report prices are finally improving after years of weakness.

“I think it depends who you are. If you are an insurer or reinsurer with excess capital and the ability to take advantage of an improving rate environment, things are getting better; things are looking up,” he said.

“If you are an insurer that had a lot of catastrophe losses that doesn’t have a lot of excess capital, you’re really only getting one side of the equation.”

Travelers and Chubb are among those often cited as the best capitalized and best placed to take advantage of improvements in the industry.

STORM CATALOG

The first signs 2012 could be a copycat of 2011 came from Australia, where Victoria state was ravaged by a severe hailstorm in late December.

The country’s top home and auto insurer, Insurance Australia Group (IAG.AX: Quote, Profile, Research, Stock Buzz), said this week that claims from the storm would push its disaster losses in the first half of the year to a level nearly 50 percent higher than expected, up to $ 434 million.

Meanwhile, Europe is being buffeted by windstorms that are more frequent than expected. RMS, one of the three firms the insurance industry relies on to model the effects of natural disasters, said earlier this month there was evidence of “clustering” in the storms that hit the continent this season.

“The 2011/2012 windstorm season is shaping up to be fairly active compared to the past 10 or so years in northern Europe,” RMS director of catastrophe response Neena Saith said in an early January report.

While the storms have been moderate, Saith said, they have nonetheless been in areas of high insured risk.

The United States is not immune, either. After a start to winter that was by most accounts incredibly mild, the weather has started to turn this week. Western North Carolina, where tornadoes are unprecedented at this time of year, was hit by at least one and perhaps more on Wednesday.

Friday could also bring severe wind gusts to major metropolitan areas in the eastern United States, AccuWeather said on Thursday.

All of that bad weather adds up, one industry veteran said, though insurers sometimes miss the ultimate point in the race to raise rates.

“The history of the insurance industry is, premiums chase losses,” said Chris Johnson, a senior vice president at engineering-focused insurer FM Global.

“What we’ve seen last year was clearly an unprecedented number of natural catastrophes, but there’s nothing to say that pattern will or will not repeat (this) year,” he said. “What I wish we could do is really focus on how do we mitigate and avoid the loss in the first place.”

(Reporting By Ben Berkowitz; Editing by Alwyn Scott; Editing by Gerald E. McCormick)

Thomson Reuters 2011. All rights reserved.

Tags: , , , ,

Property/casualty insurance rates under pressure

January 28th, 2012 by admin | Comments Off | Filed in News

NEW YORK – Property/casualty rates are under mounting upward pressure due to recent catastrophe losses and continued low interest rates that have limited investment returns, according to speakers at last week’s Property/Casualty Insurance Joint Industry Forum in New York.

In addition, a survey of industry executives who attended the event found that nearly three-quarters of respondents said the industry is in the early stages of a hard market.

After 2012 saw a concentration of international earthquake, flooding and other major catastrophe losses, insurance companies are “seriously rethinking” their exposures, and commercial rate particularly those involving catastrophe risks clearly are rising, said Jay Gelb, managing director of Barclays Capital. Mr. Gelb spoke during the event’s “Experts Panel: View From the Outside Looking In.”

In a separate panel made up of industry CEOs, J. Eric Smith, president and CEO of Swiss Re Americas, said the belief in the industry was that “you’re not going to get large catastrophes all around the globe, right? It just doesn’t work that way. Well, that went against us” last year.

In addition, the low-interest-rate environment continues to be a concern for insurers and reinsurers and will have an impact on earnings for at least the next few years, Mr. Gelb said.

“On the flip side, that gives (industry companies) more reason to raise prices, and that’s one of the things we’re seeing,” he said, noting that a “full-on hard market” should emerge within the next three years.

Another member of the experts panel, Matthew C. Mosher, senior vp-global ratings for A.M. Best Co. Inc., offered a similar time frame, noting that while there has been some improvement in property rates, the industry is still a year or two away from “something we would call a “firm’ market.”

%%BREAK%%

Low interest rates and the resultant impact on investments are causing “extreme difficulty” for reinsurers in terms of delivering consistent earnings, Mr. Smith said. That problem will have to be solved with good underwriting and a willingness to increase prices, he said.

“We think there is rate deficiency in a lot of areas,” the Swiss Re executive said. “Rates have to move up. There’s just not enough income coming in to replenish capital.”

Economic pressures have also had an impact on insurance buyers, said Shivan S. Subramaniam, chairman and CEO of Factory Mutual Insurance Co., which does business as FM Global. He noted that recent years have seen a “distinct reduction…in terms of commitment to risk improvement” as companies facing pressure on margins have reduced their risk management departments.

Meanwhile, the survey of attendees found that 72% believe the industry is in the early stages of a hard market, while 75% of the respondents said they expect an improvement in profitability.

In addition, 67% of the respondents said they believe premium growth will be higher, 31% believe it will remain flat, and only 2% believe it will decline.

Seventy-eight percent of the respondents said they believe the industry’s combined ratio will be lower in 2012 than it was in 2011.

The survey was based on the responses of approximately 40% of the nearly 250 industry representatives who attended the forum.

2012. Crain Communications, Inc.

Tags: , , , ,

U.S. Commercial Property-Insurance Rates to Climb, Marsh Says

January 27th, 2012 by admin | Comments Off | Filed in News

(Bloomberg) — U.S. businesses will probably pay more this year for property coverage after insurers took losses from natural disasters and investment income declined, Marsh & McLennan Cos.’s insurance brokerage said.

Half of U.S. clients surveyed by broker Marsh Inc. said the cost of property insurance rose in the last six months of 2011, with increases of 10 percent or more among customers at risk of losses from catastrophes, according to a report to be released today by the New York-based company. That trend is likely to continue this year, the broker said.

Travelers Cos., the insurer in the Dow Jones Industrial Average, and American International Group Inc. are among property-casualty providers raising prices after storms and earthquakes led to record industry losses last year. Insurers’ investment income is under pressure as interest rates near historic lows erode yields on bond portfolios.

“It’s really the catastrophe-exposed risks around the world that are driving” rate increases, Dean Klisura, Marsh’s U.S. risk practices leader, said in an interview. Reduced investment returns and a catastrophe model change are also contributing to the shift, he said.

U.S. commercial insurance rates rose 2.8 percent in the fourth quarter, according to a survey by the Council of Insurance Agents & Brokers. The increase was led by gains in workers’ compensation and commercial-property coverage, the trade group said in a statement yesterday.

Losses Were ‘Huge’

“Prices rose in the face of declining underwriting profitability, dwindling reserves and huge catastrophic losses,” Ken Crerar, the council’s president and chief executive officer, said in the statement.

Catastrophes worldwide caused a record $ 105 billion in insured losses last year, according to Munich Re, the world’s largest reinsurer. About $ 25 billion of those losses came from U.S. storms, including the tornado that leveled parts of Joplin, Missouri, in May. Irene, the first hurricane to make landfall in the U.S. since 2008, caused $ 7 billion in insured losses.

Insurers’ investment income has come under pressure as higher-yielding bonds mature and proceeds are reinvested at lower rates. The Federal Reserve, led by Chairman Ben S. Bernanke, repeated its view last month that economic conditions warrant “exceptionally low levels for the federal funds rate at least through mid-2013.”

Clients may face rate increases for other types of coverage, Marsh said in the report. The cost of general liability insurance may increase by as much as 5 percent in 2012. Workers’ compensation and directors-and-officers’ coverage may also rise this year, the broker said.

Marsh & McLennan, the second-biggest insurance broker, charges fees for helping clients buy coverage. The company rose 16 percent last year, trailing only Chubb Corp. among gainers in the 22-company Standard & Poor’s 500 Insurance Index.

2012 Bloomberg L.P. All Rights Reserved.

Tags: , , , , , ,

Little Known Homeowners Insurance Risks: Law & Ordinance Coverage

January 27th, 2012 by admin | Comments Off | Filed in Information And Tips

You’re a smart homeowner. You’ve always carried enough homeowners insurance. You’ve reviewed your policy regularly and added coverage when you made improvements. You even have supplement flood and earthquake policies, just in case. So imagine your shock when a fire destroys half your home and you learn that changes to your local or state building codes are going to add 50% to the cost of rebuilding…and your insurance isn’t going to pay it because of Ordinance or Law exclusions.

Regarding Ordinance and Law coverage, the Insurance Services Office, a leading information source for the property and casualty insurance industry, states in its Commercial Property Causes  of Loss forms that insurers will not pay for loss or damage caused directly or indirectly by “the enforcement of any ordinance or law: 1) regulating the construction, use or repair of any property; or 2) Requiring the tearing down of any property, including the cost of removing its debris.” A similar exclusion is included in most other property
insurance forms, including homeowners.

The exclusion is the insurance industry’s reaction to ever-changing codes that specify more expensive materials or construction and installation methods to rebuild a damaged property, shifts in zoning laws that
calls for expensive building, lot size or frontage requirements and restrictions, and stringent environmental and pollution control laws governing demolition or reconstruction. Some laws even designate that when a certain percentage of a building has been damaged, then the rest of it must be destroyed before you can begin to rebuild. And if you live in an area that is prone to earthquakes, floods, or hurricanes, you’ll certainly face prohibitions about where, how or whether you can rebuild.

Essentially, your risk as a homeowner falls into three areas:

  • The loss of value to the undamaged part of your home that has to be demolished or modified to meet current codes, or when the building damage is greater than the percentage allowed by code, or when rebuilding is not allowed under current code.
  • The cost to demolish and remove debris from the undamaged part of your home that has to torn down (your insurance will cover removing debris from the part of your home that was destroyed).
  • The increased cost to repair or rebuild to meet current code.

So, what can you do to avoid unpleasant surprises and protect your property? Talk to your insurance agent and discuss your risk exposure. Some insurance companies now offer Ordinance and Law coverage that
will take care of the cost to tear down the undamaged part  of your home and the cost to rebuild it to current code. Your agent can help you determine how much coverage you need.

Tags: , , , , , ,